There is an
article in today's FT written by Rolls Royce Chief Executive Sir John Rose. In it he explains that 'Britain needs an industrial route map' and that 'a broadly based economy that includes high-value manufacturing is likely to be more resilient than a narrowly based one'. His article includes:
- Warren buffet has drawn attention to he risk that the economy's structure may make it vulnerable to any US led recession.
- Strongly branded, export orientated manufacturing companies with a focus on technology and productivity can succeed in world markets
- That a UK economy that has a 'route map' for high value manufacturing will be better able to weather the ups and downs of the global economy.
Having an element of high value manufacturing in the UK is of course a commendable asset. The UK's manufacturing sector does contribute a significant and impressive amount to the country's economy, summed up brilliantly
here by Ian Pearson of the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills:
'I don't need to tell anyone in this room that Manufacturing is the lifeblood of our economy, providing around 3 million good quality jobs and comprising over half of all exports.
The UK is the world's 6th largest manufacturer and the manufacturing industries combined (including construction, oil and gas) make up more than a quarter (27%) of our entire GDP.'
However, A 'route map' to increase the level of manufacturing in the UK economy to over a third seems to me to make it more vulnerable to the modern global economy than less. Where do we expect most of our manufacturing orders to come from? The West or the East? What is consumer spending like at the moment for UK goods? What is the exchange rate of the pound in comparison to the Dollar? What is the availability of capital for large firms to procure high value goods?
Wages in the UK are considerably higher than those in the developing world. The minimum wage is currently £5.52 an hour. The average wage for 'High value manufacturing' staff in the UK would surely be higher still. Although I couldn't obtain accurate figures for high value manufacturing wages in general in China,
here is a link to substantial data that points to rising but still significantly lower manufacturing wage rates. However, is the quality of manufacturing in the developing world not available? Not if you ask Sir John Himself surely; as Rolls Royce themselves have out-sourced some of their manufacturing to Singapore as he himself tells the
BBC . I don't think any part of the manufacture of an exceptional Rolls Royce engine is not 'high value'
'we must develop a framework or 'route map' to set priorities for both public and private sector investment' Does this mean that the Government needs to subsidise Research and Development, sow the seeds of innovation in Technology parks and subsidise Foreign Companies looking to establish manufacturing in the UK?
Exchange rates are not currently beneficial to UK exports. With the Chinese Government controlling their exchange rate and the weakness of the Dollar we are not best placed to be chasing export led growth. Sir John laments the service based industry that provides '1m well paid jobs, large corporation tax revenues and a positive balance of payments of about £20bn' compared to manufacturing's 'loss of 1m jobs over the past 10 years'. There was a good reason for these job losses. We are not well placed to be manufacturing focused in the world economy.
In conclusion Sir john says that 'My conclusion is a positive one. Provided that we do not engage in the usual protracted political debate, we have a real opportunity to develop a national consensus on the way ahead for the UK economy that is capable of having a generational impact.' What on earth? He wants to change the focus of the whole UK economy without protracted political debate? John, mate, stick to making planes and stop writing in the exceptional and award winning FT.
Tom Friedman wrote a book called the World is Flat. In it he describes a pilot project by McDonalds in the USA where the guy who talks to the customers at a drive through is actaully in a call centre sending the orders to the kitchen via the internet. The call centre could be anywhere, but the point is that is a flat global economy Land, Labour and Capital rates are not only all important but extremely portable. Companies will use the best and cheapest wherever it may be to improve its profit and loss everywhere possible. Yes we do need technical people graduating in the sciences, Technology parks and R&D incentives etc, just there is no reason why UK companies can't be listed here, pay tax here, employ management and skilled staff here and get the manufacturing done elsewhere. What hope have we for manufacturing to be raised to 30% of GDP or even higher here? Should we focus on something that Sir John himself admits is in rapid decline or try to further improve what we do very well already and focus on our service industry and an intellectually based comparative advantage.
The author is of average intellect and has little to no experience in manual labour let alone manufacturing.
Labels: Globalisation, Manufacturing in the UK, Sir John Rose